← Methodology
Production · Metric

Value-Capture / Adjustment-Burden

value-capture-adjustment-burden

Definition

value-capture-adjustment-burden measures structural power over for whom production is organized — who sets the arrangements that determine who keeps the surplus and who bears the cost of adjustment. The structural question is: who sets the terms that allocate the gains and burdens of global production? — not who ends up richer. Realized value-capture is a symptom; the power is authorship of the arrangements that produce it. This metric serves Strange's "for whom" clause.

Strange's grounding

Strange makes "for whom / who benefits" a defining clause of the production structure (Strange 1994, p.64) and — crucially — frames distribution as the result of arrangements, not of chance, which is what keeps it on the power side rather than the outcome side:

  • "what is produced, by whom and for whom, by what method and on what terms" (Strange 1994, p.64)
  • "when a social group loses power… big changes are apt to follow in who produces what and how they are organized - and consequently in cui bono, in who benefits" (Strange 1994, p.64)
  • and when the production structure itself changes, "big changes are apt to follow in the distribution of social and political power" (Strange 1994, p.64)
  • the distributional questions: "Who benefits, who loses? Who carries the risks and who is spared from risk? Who gets the opportunities and who is denied an opportunity?" (Strange 1994, p.18)
  • the decisive framing: arrangements "are not divinely ordained, nor… the fortuitous outcome of blind chance. Rather they are the result of human decisions taken in the context of man-made institutions and sets of self-set rules and customs" (Strange 1994, p.18)
  • the adjustment burden: "the burden of what is euphemistically called adjustment falling much more heavily on the developing than the industrialized countries" (Strange 1994, p.81)

Strange 1994, p.18 is the settlement: distribution is the consequence of arrangements, so measuring who sets the arrangements is structural power; measuring who got rich is outcome. This metric scores the former.

Components

ComponentStructural question it answersCitable source
Surplus-capture termsWho sets the terms determining who retains value (vs low-margin assembly)?OECD TiVA value-added terms; pricing-power & margin-control data
Adjustment-burden impositionWho can push the cost of economic adjustment onto others (structure-wide)?IMF/WB adjustment-conditionality records; terms-of-trade shifts
Terms-of-trade settingWho shapes the relative prices allocating gains between producers?UNCTAD terms-of-trade series

Scores across the twelve

US 95.0 Germany 68.0 France 61.7 China 61.3 UK 61.3 Japan 59.3 Italy 45.7 Canada 40.3 Russia 23.7 India 19.0 Brazil 16.3 South Africa 8.0

Normalized component-mean for this metric, 0–95. Click a nation for its full breakdown.